three years of escrow threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Been lurking in c/trialwatch for about 4 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 50, 10mg, and USDC is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 27 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 56.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the 17% discount versus 33% network fees
Did you check confirmation speed on that chain?
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
USDC exists on 12 networks, vendor credits are network-specific
Sent orfo payment to the wrong chain. Denmark, wrong network, vendor could not credit it. 13 day lesson.
chargeback rights are USDC: zero
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
chargeback rights are USDC: zero
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 6 weeks to accept.
chargeback rights are USDC: zero
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
Strongly agree.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 79 weeks to accept.
[removed by moderator]
never post a wallet address, not yours, not a vendor's
[removed by moderator]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
no price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion
the 24% discount versus 23% network fees
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
- 1Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.5 comments in this branch · started by u/zeynep_zielinski
- 2chargeback rights are USDC: zero4 comments in this branch · started by u/solene_ilunga