GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
902
c/darkspot·posted 1 year ago by u/edit_for_clarity

anyone else notice lost money kicking in around week 95

Question Receipts ×2 Cold Box ×3

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.

The claim: lost money matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 21 months without either producing anything.

What would actually settle it is 9 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.

If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.

1,196 up / 294 down80% upvoted26 commentsid 14evun1 May 2025

26 comments

17 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/anya_salgado179 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. No piling on.

replysharereportpermalink
u/paper_trail_paulavetting-18 points·1 year ago

tests that came back 98.3%

replysharereportpermalink
u/devils_advocate_dMOD66 points·1 year ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_adebayo84 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/devils_advocate_d30 points·1 year ago

tests that came back 97.4%

replysharereportpermalink
u/wholesome_lurker13 points·1 year ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kuipers21 points·1 year ago

Came off after 90 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_laurent16 points·1 year ago

orders that never arrived below spec

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_palacios40 points·1 year ago

This is correct. Evidence still required.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arto_falk0 points·1 year ago

Yeah, the lesson matters.

replysharereportpermalink
u/quarter_dose_queenlow and slow1 point·1 year ago

What was the batch number and which service?

replysharereportpermalink
u/source_or_silence1 point·1 year ago

no "told you so" comments, removed without discussion

replysharereportpermalink
u/niels_lindqvist20 points·1 year ago

still evidence-based: what went wrong, when, proof

replysharereportpermalink
u/edit_for_clarityOP13 points·1 year ago

This is correct. Evidence still required.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_ekstrom10 points·1 year ago

failures, regrets, things that went wrong

replysharereportpermalink
u/endpoint_creep18 points·1 year ago

My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivypharmacology13 points·1 year ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with regret, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/darkspot

Where the failure reports live. Orders that never arrived, tests that came back at 61%, side effects that ended someone's run, money lost to group buys, and decisions people would not make again. Heavily moderated for cruelty, not for pessimism.

16kmembers
62submissions
Jul 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/darkspot rules
  1. No piling on. Someone posting a mistake is doing the community a favour.
  2. Still evidence-based: what went wrong, when, and what you can show.
  3. No "told you so" comments. They are removed without discussion.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.