Skip to content

Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] how do you actually verify below spec — 21 comments in the full submission. View in context.

578

c/darkspot·submitted 1 months ago by u/lukas_delgado

[Question] how do you actually verify below spec

Questionbranch of 4 comments

Week 7 update. 43kg down from the start, reflux basically gone since about week 59. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with reflux. The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering,…

Read the full submission and all 21 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 1 months ago

u/arto_falk51 points·1 months ago·edited

Mechanistically the bit that matters is what went wrong. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

replysharereportpermalink

u/fabio_kuipers-28 points·1 months ago

heavily moderated for cruelty, not pessimism

replysharereportpermalink

[deleted]1 point·1 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink

u/lina_ndiaye1 point·1 months ago

[deleted]

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 83 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/darkspot

Where the failure reports live. Orders that never arrived, tests that came back at 61%, side effects that ended someone's run, money lost to group buys, and decisions people would not make again. Heavily moderated for cruelty, not for pessimism.

16kmembers

62submissions

Jul 2024created

submissions / month, last year

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

More in c/darkspot

1what would you tell week-1 you about regret3.2k points · 58 comments
2genuine question about what went wrong that I am slightly embarrassed to ask2.4k points · 62 comments
3what went wrong is the most under-discussed thing in c/progresspics2.1k points · 48 comments
4[Meta] the stopped rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining1.8k points · 47 comments
5the Netherlands: lost money, and what it actually costs here1.5k points · 24 comments
6[Lab] SSA orfo — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2%1.5k points · 48 comments

c/darkspot rules

No piling on. Someone posting a mistake is doing the community a favour.
Still evidence-based: what went wrong, when, and what you can show.
No "told you so" comments. They are removed without discussion.
Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.

Full rules and how they are enforced →

Moderators

u/burned_once_twice u/reta_and_regret u/ledger_mod u/devils_advocate_d

Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.

Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →