three years of tracking threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: dose history matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 7 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 5 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
consistency is harder than the dose change
one log per person, update it, do not repost
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
public logs kept over 4 weeks and beyond
include dose and date on every update
Not convinced.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
one log per person, update it, do not repost
logs that stop 21 days get Concluded flair automatically
update rather than repost, 21 people doing this
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
public logs kept over 7 weeks and beyond
consistency is harder than the dose change
This is correct. Long-term logs matter.
- 1Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.5 comments in this branch · started by u/controversial_only