anyone else notice dose history kicking in around week 20
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: dose history matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 15 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 35 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Mechanistically the bit that matters is weight. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
[deleted]
include dose and date on every update
include dose and date on every update
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 67 weeks to accept.
update rather than repost, 8 people doing this
public logs kept over 2 weeks and beyond
include dose and date on every update
This is correct. Long-term logs matter.
include dose and date on every update
Stalled for 22 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 34.
the 25 week mark is where it gets interesting
- 1public logs kept over 2 weeks and beyond7 comments in this branch · started by u/britta_nakamura
- 2Mechanistically the bit that matters is weight. It explains most of the…6 comments in this branch · started by u/leila_silva