switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the nausea got better, not worse
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 1.0mg to 15mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 3 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have muscle cramps I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 73 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is correct. Long-term logs matter.
dose, date, weight, waist, fatigue, labs
the people still updating at week 52 are the reward
Maintenance for 12 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
the people still updating at week 52 are the reward
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
[removed by moderator]
Yeah, the consistency is the value.
the people still updating at week 3 are the reward
long-running logs are the value
long-running logs are the value
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 52 weeks to accept.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Sceptical.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
consistency is harder than the dose change
one log per person, update it, do not repost
one log per person, update it, do not repost
Adding to this: dose history is doing more work than the comment implies.
update rather than repost, 24 people doing this
Strongly agree. Update rather than repost.
What was the batch number and which service?
- 1the people still updating at week 52 are the reward9 comments in this branch · started by u/hugo_bergstrom