tried compounding for 7 weeks. here is what happened.
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: Australia matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 14 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 23 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Came off after 42 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
The early fullness was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
no naming compounders operating against current rules
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
PBS listings change the cost completely
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Strongly agree. AU and NZ differ.
the Ireland versus Ireland distinction is real
the 2024 compounding rule change closed a major route overnight
- 1Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.6 comments in this branch · started by u/emil_barros