New Zealand: what the trials say vs what this community says
Been lurking in c/hplc for about 15 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 11, 10mg, and New Zealand is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 7 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 17.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. AU and NZ differ.
Came off after 43 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
the regulatory TGA is the blocker
unfunded-means-full-price is the NZ reality
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
Week 85 for me and the honest summary is: 26kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
Week 85 for me and the honest summary is: 26kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
Adding to this: shortage is doing more work than the comment implies.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
no naming compounders operating against current rules
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
- 1Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual…5 comments in this branch · started by u/anecdata_annie
- 2The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.4 comments in this branch · started by u/blunt_coldbox_2024