first time — my 6-week log, condensed into one table
Right, the week one question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 19 data points over 40 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 44, not week 93. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
[removed by moderator]
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 85 weeks to accept.
what is bac water — bacteriostatic water, preservative included
Strongly agree. No question is dumb here.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
- 1Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next…4 comments in this branch · started by u/asks_dumb_questions
- 2Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different…4 comments in this branch · started by u/rina_bergstrom