what changed for me between week 20 and week 69
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking beginner against eGFR for 11 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
This is a good question, genuinely.
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 5.
the basics question is not dumb
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 9.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
what is a COA — certificate of analysis, document from the lab
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
no dose recommendations for individuals, even here
week two nothing happening — yes, that is normal
week two nothing happening — yes, that is normal
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
what is titration — it means going slow on the escalation
The basics question took me three weeks to understand. Wiki explained it eventually.
Are you on a pen or vial?
what is a COA — certificate of analysis, document from the lab
week two nothing happening — yes, that is normal
rudeness is removed faster than bad questions
Week 12 checking in: nothing on the scale, no nausea, wondering if the pen is broken. No, it is just week 12.
Week 11 checking in: nothing on the scale, no nausea, wondering if the pen is broken. No, it is just week 11.
[deleted]
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 14.
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
Strongly agree. No question is dumb here.
Week 11 checking in: nothing on the scale, no nausea, wondering if the pen is broken.
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
- 1Week 12 checking in: nothing on the scale, no nausea, wondering if the pen…8 comments in this branch · started by u/britt_zamora
- 2The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…7 comments in this branch · started by u/plain_titration