formulary: what the trials say vs what this community says
Quick one. Canada here.
special authorization works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 3 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
special authorisation is province-specific
special authorisation is province-specific
Adding to this: province is doing more work than the comment implies.
special authorisation is province-specific
no cross-border purchasing instructions
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.
[removed by moderator]
the the Netherlands answer is not the the Netherlands answer
provincial formularies differ sharply
the Spain answer is not the Spain answer
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with special authorization, not with what you concluded.
How many weeks between the two measurements?
The reflux was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
- 1The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…8 comments in this branch · started by u/ahmed_rasmussen
- 2special authorisation is province-specific5 comments in this branch · started by u/emil_okwuosa