[Results] 92 weeks, 10kg, and special authorization was the hard part
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 2.4mg, week 73, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — Canada — and tracked it for 10 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.
name your province, coverage is provincial
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
private plan details: redact your group number
the the Netherlands answer is not the the Netherlands answer
the the Netherlands answer is not the the Netherlands answer
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
name your province, coverage is provincial
Slight fix: the number was 96.2, not 96.8. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Slight fix: the number was 96.2, not 96.8.
Adding to this: special authorization is doing more work than the comment implies.
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.
special authorisation is province-specific
no cross-border purchasing instructions
no cross-border purchasing instructions
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with special authorization, not with what you concluded.
- 1the the Netherlands answer is not the the Netherlands answer6 comments in this branch · started by u/vikram_asante
- 2Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.5 comments in this branch · started by u/enzo_ferrari