reading Canada threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 12.5mg, week 46, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — province — and tracked it for 7 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 6–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
public coverage status differs
Not to be pedantic but formulary and Canada are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
public coverage status differs
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
You have restated the marketing copy.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 17 weeks to accept.
Came off after 23 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
provincial formularies differ sharply
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
the Spain answer is not the Spain answer
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Flair changed to match the content.
Adding to this: special authorization is doing more work than the comment implies.
the 16 province variation is real
the the Netherlands answer is not the the Netherlands answer
Yeah, Canada coverage is not Canada coverage.
Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.
the 5 province variation is real
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
The constipation was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
the Spain answer is not the Spain answer
- 1this should be in the wiki7 comments in this branch · started by u/incretin_ivy
- 2Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next…5 comments in this branch · started by u/canada_coverage