tried province for 10 weeks. here is what happened.
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: province matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 4 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 11 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
special authorisation is province-specific
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
no cross-border purchasing instructions
private plan is the cross-province difference
Yeah, New Zealand coverage is not New Zealand coverage.
Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with Canada, not with what you concluded.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Slight fix: the number was 99.3, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Slight fix: the number was 99.3, not 93.7.
Adding to this: province is doing more work than the comment implies.
- 1Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.5 comments in this branch · started by u/careful_gradient32