what changed for me between week 35 and week 84
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: mechanism matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 11 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 27 people measuring the same…
Mechanistically the bit that matters is half-life. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
central appetite signalling is real but people overweight it
central appetite signalling is real but people overweight it
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.