GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is — 46 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.1k
c/progresspics·submitted 1 year ago by u/georgi_adebayo

[PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is

Discussionbranch of 11 comments

Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on timeframe in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with…

Read the full submission and all 46 comments →

This branch

11 comments, started 1 year ago
u/camila_vasquez118 points·1 year ago

This is correct. Process matters more than the number.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]84 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_perrin123 points·1 year ago

starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepo78 points·1 year ago

include timeframe and starting point or it is a brag with no info

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_hovland51 points·1 year ago

the community is deliberately image-free

replysharereportpermalink
u/patient_labslip_log31 points·1 year ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with goal, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/georgi_adebayoOP29 points·1 year ago

Stalled for 20 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 40.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cold_chromatogram3166 points·1 year ago

Yeah, text-only removes the comparison.

replysharereportpermalink
u/salma_almeida39 points·1 year ago

the milestone milestone is worth posting

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_teixeira10 points·1 year ago

text removes the comparison trap

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_karlsen14 points·1 year ago

text removes the body-shaming pile-on

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.