stalled for 10 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time
I have had 16 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 40 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 96.8% against a claimed 99.1%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
no images, none, not even redacted ones
[deleted]
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
[deleted]
Adding to this: goal is doing more work than the comment implies.
no images, none, not even redacted ones
the struggle change matters as much as the scale
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
text only is the whole point of the community
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
- 1starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history9 comments in this branch · started by u/dexa_twice_yearly