GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1k
c/progresspics·posted 1 year ago by u/marta_dziedzic

tried progress for 3 weeks. here is what happened.

Discussion Receipts ×9 Long Haul ×1

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.

I have been tracking progress against eGFR for 13 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.

Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.

tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.

1,314 up / 289 down82% upvoted37 commentsid m28wdk29 Apr 2025

37 comments

6 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/cato_batista251 points·1 year ago·edited

This is correct. Process matters more than the number.

replysharereportpermalink
u/salma_almeida117 points·1 year ago

What was the batch number and which service?

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]52 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_grimaldi18 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook_ftw12 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elise_ramos-2 points·1 year ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.