tried progress for 3 weeks. here is what happened.
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking progress against eGFR for 13 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
What was the batch number and which service?
[removed by moderator]
[removed by moderator]
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
[removed by moderator]
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
- 1This is correct. Process matters more than the number.5 comments in this branch · started by u/cato_batista