why does everyone say week 4 is the wall
I have had 11 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 20 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
My version: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part. Nobody believes that until they do it.
stalled at 10mg, went up, and regretted it, the stall would have broken anyway
week 24 and i am still not at maintenance, do not rush the ladder
Cosigning. The slow route gets the outcome, the fast route gets you the side effects.
[deleted]
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
week 77 on the pen, 23kg down, this is the answer
Hard agree. Week 40 me needed this. Week 89 me is nodding smugly.
The thing nobody prepared me for was that the appetite does not come back for a long time after you stop.
Yeah, 78 weeks on 0.25mg, same pattern, same timing.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Disagree on that part. 96.2% and 96.8% on the same vial is normal.
- 1Cosigning. The slow route gets the outcome, the fast route gets you the side…4 comments in this branch · started by u/iman_falk