weekly dosing is the most under-discussed thing in c/labresults
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 0.25mg to 10mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 16 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have muscle…
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
titration speed is weekly dosing plus side effects, period
my ALT moved before the scale did and i nearly missed it
week 89 on the pen, 25kg down, this is the answer
You have restated the marketing copy.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
Small correction: the trial was 2 weeks, not 20. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Lost 22kg and gained a genuinely irritating amount of interest in analytical chemistry. This site did that to me.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
okay but what dose of sema are you on
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Ozempic versus Wegovy versus research grade is the wrong argument, they are literally the same molecule
nope, 0.25 counts, it is just not the dose most people stay on
okay but what dose of sema are you on
okay but what dose of sema are you on
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Ozempic versus Wegovy versus research grade is the wrong argument, they are literally the same molecule