genuine question about Ozempic that I am slightly embarrassed to ask
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on Ozempic in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
This is what I tell everyone in c/newbiequestions and they never believe me until week 9.
Small correction: the trial was 11 weeks, not 8. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
What was the method? "HPLC" is a technique, not a method.
week 79 and i am still not at maintenance, do not rush the ladder
stalled at 0.5mg, went up, and regretted it, the stall would have broken anyway
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with plateau, not with what you concluded.
week 52 and i am still not at maintenance, do not rush the ladder
What was the method?
Disagree on that part. 99.3% and 93.7% on the same vial is normal.
the reflux passes. i promise. not medical advice.
- 1What was the method? "HPLC" is a technique, not a method.7 comments in this branch · started by u/alcohol_aversion