Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the T2D advice in here is 19 years out of date — 18 comments in the full submission. View in context.
677
[Discussion] the T2D advice in here is 19 years out of date
I have had 12 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 14 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February. The independent number came back 98.4% against a claimed…
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
glycaemic control first, that is the original indication
Slight fix: the number was 98.1, not 98.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Slight fix: the number was 98.1, not 98.0.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.