GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Vendor] CPC — 2001 establishment date checks out against the company registry — 36 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.8k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 24 days ago by u/zofia_lindholm

[Vendor] CPC — 2001 establishment date checks out against the company registry

Vendorbranch of 8 comments

Week 21 update. 37kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 61. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness. The part that surprised me is how much of this is…

Read the full submission and all 36 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 23 days ago
u/marit_sandvik187 points·23 days ago

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bpc_scepticresearch peptides117 points·23 days ago

Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was SGN.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_weiss31 points·23 days ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts52 points·22 days ago

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution12 points·22 days ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts61 points·23 days ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_lindholm49 points·22 days ago

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial39 points·22 days ago

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.