GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] order records is doing more work than we give it credit for — 34 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.7k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 5 months ago by u/rina_nascimento

[Discussion] order records is doing more work than we give it credit for

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

Quick one. Canada here. Janoshik works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US. Specifics: the route I used took 5 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the…

Read the full submission and all 34 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 5 months ago
u/batch_number_bertieMOD13 points·5 months ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/adnan_sandvik11 points·5 months ago

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_kuipers3 points·5 months ago

Removed a chain here.

Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_villalobos2 points·5 months ago

Removed a chain here.

Adding to this: VendorInvestigate is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_ferreira1 point·5 months ago

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_dziedzic11 points·5 months ago·edited

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →