GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of Medutest — 22 things I got wrong before I got it right — 38 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.3k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 months ago by u/signe_villalobos

Medutest — 22 things I got wrong before I got it right

Resolvedbranch of 4 comments

Been lurking in c/tirzepatide for about 20 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 15, 2.5mg, and Medutest is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 37 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know…

Read the full submission and all 38 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 2 months ago
u/janoshik_junkieMOD207 points·2 months ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/signe_villalobosOP-19 points·2 months ago

WXT three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.6% anyway, so no harm done.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ruben_brandt1 point·2 months ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting1 point·2 months ago

SWB order #3, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.