GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether Janoshik is why — 27 comments in the full submission. View in context.
438
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/zaid_eriksen

my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether Janoshik is why

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking PeptideMeter against eGFR for 35 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one…

Read the full submission and all 27 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution32 points·2 years ago·edited

Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sterile_field_steph41 points·2 years ago

the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeida14 points·2 years ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/batch_number_bertievetting10 points·2 years ago

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

replysharereportpermalink
u/batch_number_bertievetting5 points·2 years ago

SWB order #15, New Zealand, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/amara_haddad8 points·2 years ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/ipamorelin_i27 points·2 years ago

How many orders from SWB is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →