GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of why does nobody talk about order records — 9 comments in the full submission. View in context.
0
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/scam_taxonomy

why does nobody talk about order records

Vendorbranch of 8 comments

Quick one. Canada here. reship works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US. Specifics: the route I used took 6 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the…

Read the full submission and all 9 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 years ago
u/anders_osei-33 points·2 years ago
saved. thank you.
replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting1 point·2 years ago

Yeah, BCH took 21 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/column_dead_volume1 point·2 years ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_kuipers1 point·2 years ago·edited

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

Adding to this: Medutest is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyOPc/scamalerts1 point·2 years ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei1 point·2 years ago·edited

How many orders from MKM is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyOPc/scamalerts1 point·2 years ago

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →