[Discussion] the reship advice in here is 13 years out of date
I have had 24 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 18 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 96.8% against a claimed 99.1%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
- 1Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is…5 comments in this branch · started by u/paper_trail_paula