PeptideMeter — my 17-week log, condensed into one table
vendor. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/insurancefights is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort vendor out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 9 months. My ApoB was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Reship experience: MKM asked for photos, processed it in 9 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
the batch number or it did not happen
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
QST took 14 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
the reship rate on QSC is actually pretty consistent
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Adding to this: Janoshik is doing more work than the comment implies.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
- 1source?8 comments in this branch · started by u/greta_perrin
- 2one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread5 comments in this branch · started by u/zofia_lindholm