GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of reship — my 22-week log, condensed into one table — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
610
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/kasper_cabrera

reship — my 22-week log, condensed into one table

Questionbranch of 8 comments

Confession thread, sort of. I went from 10mg to 2.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 12 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have early…

Read the full submission and all 25 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/zeynep_villalobos-28 points·1 year ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_nkemelu1 point·1 year ago

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

replysharereportpermalink
u/adnan_karlsen1 point·1 year ago

the batch number or it did not happen

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieMOD1 point·1 year ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_ndiaye1 point·1 year ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nz_unfunded1 point·1 year ago

CPC order #21, Spain, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/ipamorelin_i1 point·1 year ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/spreadsheet_gremlindata1 point·1 year ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →