GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of week 11 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me — 68 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5.4k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/denied_again_d

week 11 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me

Needs Sourcebranch of 5 comments

Right, the VendorInvestigate question again, but with numbers this time. I have 6 data points over 20 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 68 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 1 year ago
u/gustav_lindholm218 points·1 year ago

Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeida69 points·1 year ago

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_lokken23 points·1 year ago·edited

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei16 points·1 year ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_pires8 points·1 year ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →