GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of Spain: reship, and what it actually costs here — 31 comments in the full submission. View in context.
4.7k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/viktor_girard

Spain: reship, and what it actually costs here

Labbranch of 6 comments

vendor. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/insurancefights is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort vendor out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 2 months. My ApoB was…

Read the full submission and all 31 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/ruben_brandt462 points·1 year ago

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_girardOP670 points·1 year ago

Reship experience: SGN asked for photos, processed it in 22 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cormac_pereira365 points·1 year ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/batch_number_bertieMOD255 points·1 year ago·edited

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_eriksen192 points·1 year ago

Flair changed to match the content.

Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_duarte126 points·1 year ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →