[Meta] proposal — a flair for vendor posts
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: PeptideMeter matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 17 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 37 people measuring the…
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
[removed by moderator]
[removed by moderator]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 11 weeks to accept.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
the VendorInvestigate result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Not to be pedantic but reship and order records are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?