Skip to content

Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] testing is doing more work than we give it credit for — 51 comments in the full submission. View in context.

3.4k

c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/sterile_field_steph

[Discussion] testing is doing more work than we give it credit for

Discussionbranch of 4 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/glp1muscle repeats that Medutest is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 3 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because…

Read the full submission and all 51 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 2 years ago

u/gustav_lindholm167 points·2 years ago

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

replysharereportpermalink

u/ismael_pires60 points·2 years ago

order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.

replysharereportpermalink

u/milos_vestergaard53 points·2 years ago

Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.

replysharereportpermalink

u/search_before_post135 points·2 years ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers

130submissions

Aug 2023created

submissions / month, last year

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

More in c/vendorvetting

111 months in and testing is still the thing I get wrong14k points · 26 comments
2[Lab] 20th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part13k points · 44 comments
3Medutest — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right11k points · 58 comments
4[Meta] proposal — a flair for vendor posts11k points · 67 comments
5switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the reflux got better, not worse10k points · 39 comments
6small win: testing stopped being a problem at week 659.1k points · 15 comments

c/vendorvetting rules

One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.

Full rules and how they are enforced →

Moderators

u/ledger_mod u/receipts_or_nothing u/paper_trail_paula u/batch_number_bertie u/janoshik_junkie

Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.

Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →