Skip to content

Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of testing: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 — 30 comments in the full submission. View in context.

1.6k

c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/valeria_cardoso

testing: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1

PSAbranch of 5 comments

Right, the VendorInvestigate question again, but with numbers this time. I have 5 data points over 6 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 30 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 1 year ago

u/hamza_serrano349 points·1 year ago

genuine question, not being difficult: how do you know

replysharereportpermalink

u/solene_eriksen192 points·1 year ago

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

replysharereportpermalink

u/throwaway_titration50 points·1 year ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink

u/aleksi_lehtinen34 points·1 year ago

order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.

replysharereportpermalink

u/bpc_scepticresearch peptides12 points·1 year ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers

130submissions

Aug 2023created

submissions / month, last year

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

More in c/vendorvetting

111 months in and testing is still the thing I get wrong14k points · 26 comments
2[Lab] 20th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part13k points · 44 comments
3Medutest — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right11k points · 58 comments
4[Meta] proposal — a flair for vendor posts11k points · 67 comments
5switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the reflux got better, not worse10k points · 39 comments
6small win: testing stopped being a problem at week 659.1k points · 15 comments

c/vendorvetting rules

One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.

Full rules and how they are enforced →

Moderators

u/ledger_mod u/receipts_or_nothing u/paper_trail_paula u/batch_number_bertie u/janoshik_junkie

Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.

Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →