u/ahmed_iyer
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Uppsala.
member · joined 11 Feb 2025
Comments — page 4 of 4
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about Zepbound until somebody posts a number in c/tirzepatide · 43 points · 1 year ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on [Discussion] the endpoint advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 37 points · 1 year ago
the 10 week readout is different from the 16 week readout
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about rodent data in c/bpc157 · 30 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on week 96 check-in — 11kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/tirzepatide · 79 points · 1 year ago
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 97.6% body weight at 21 weeks.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about endpoint until somebody posts a number in c/trialwatch · 68 points · 1 year ago
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
comment on week 71 check-in — 17kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/tirzepatide · 109 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Tirz is better than sema is not a claim without a comparator dose.
comment on [Question] GIP — what am I missing here in c/tirzepatide · 43 points · 1 year ago
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on week 71 check-in — 7kg down, reflux manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bpc157 · 67 points · 2 years ago
regulatory status changed in 19 countries, check yours
comment on someone explain BPC-157 to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/bpc157 · 39 points · 2 years ago
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
comment on someone explain UK to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/glp1uk · 11 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the NHS waitlist is genuinely two years in most places.
comment on someone explain UK to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/glp1uk · 121 points · 2 years ago
England or Scotland? Different pathways.
comment on someone explain UK to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/glp1uk · 82 points · 2 years ago
What is today's date for the pricing?
comment on NHS: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1uk · 0 points · 2 years ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on NHS: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1uk · 13 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on TRIUMPH — 13 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/trialwatch · 38 points · 2 years ago
Which trial and what was the primary endpoint?
comment on [Results] 57 weeks, 20kg, and tirzepatide was the hard part in c/tirzepatide · 0 points · 2 years ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.