380
does BPC-157 actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: tendon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have…
u/ayesha_erdogan
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Osijek.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
4,807post karma
3,407comment karma
5submissions
56comments
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 30kg, and hair loss was the hard part in c/sideeffects · 199 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the fatigue hit on day 6 for me too, not day 1.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring gallbladder at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/sideeffects · 481 points · 1 year ago
Crossposting this to c/bpc157 because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify sulphur burps in c/sideeffects · -19 points · 1 year ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 28 is worth checking
comment on three years of heart rate threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 1 year ago
Same experience. Week 94 and it simply stopped. I know that is not useful information but it is what happened.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #14 — France, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/sideeffects · 77 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Describe your dose, your week number, and your titration speed or nobody can help.
comment on week 76 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/sideeffects · 10 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on non-peptide in c/orforglipron · 12 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 17 weeks, not 15. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Results] 67 weeks, 21kg, and province was the hard part in c/glp1canada · 30 points · 1 year ago
Came off after 6 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on [Results] 67 weeks, 21kg, and province was the hard part in c/glp1canada · -5 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Results] 67 weeks, 21kg, and province was the hard part in c/glp1canada · 59 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.
477
[Results] 67 weeks, 21kg, and province was the hard part
special authorization. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/glp1muscle is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux,…
comment on nobody warned me about fatigue and I would have liked the warning in c/sideeffects · 6 points · 1 year ago
week 71 and the muscle cramps is finally getting better
comment on [Meta] the Canada rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/glp1canada · 38 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Name your province.
comment on [Meta] the Canada rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/glp1canada · 33 points · 1 year ago
special authorisation is province-specific
comment on small win: fatigue stopped being a problem at week 6 in c/sideeffects · 30 points · 2 years ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on someone explain BPC-157 to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/bpc157 · 65 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/sideeffects · 165 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. The reflux is horrible for three weeks and then just ends.
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/sideeffects · 72 points · 2 years ago
Did the the food-noise thing start before or after the dose increase?
comment on ACHIEVE — my 19-week log, condensed into one table in c/orforglipron · 5 points · 2 years ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.