u/batch_number_bertie
Same batch number on two different vendors means one thing and it is not good.
long-standing contributor · vetting · joined 24 Oct 2023
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on small win: regulatory stopped being a problem at week 96 in c/bpc157 · 4 points · 6 months ago
the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only
comment on small win: order records stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/vendorvetting · 381 points · 6 months ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on 4 months in and dead space is still the thing I get wrong in c/reconstitution · 86 points · 6 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is concentration. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about bacteriostatic water until somebody posts a number in c/reconstitution · 18 points · 7 months ago
This is correct. 2mL versus 24mL is the common mistake.
comment on reading PeptideMeter threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/vendorvetting · 154 points · 7 months ago
First order from QST was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.
comment on someone explain vendor to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 28 points · 7 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on rodent data: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/bpc157 · 14 points · 8 months ago
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
comment on [Discussion] the reship advice in here is 13 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 36 points · 8 months ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on three years of dead space threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/reconstitution · 0 points · 8 months ago
dead space is real and the syringe matters
comment on [Question] is 99.2% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error in c/vendorvetting · 10 points · 8 months ago
Reship experience: JEEP asked for photos, processed it in 3 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
comment on research peptides vs TB-500 — genuinely asking which matters more in c/researchpeptides · 5 points · 9 months ago
Second this question. I have wondered about thymosin for 17 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on [Discussion] pentadecapeptide is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/bpc157 · 7 points · 9 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on genuine question about testing that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 251 points · 9 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on genuine question about testing that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 100 points · 9 months ago
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
comment on why does nobody talk about dead space in c/reconstitution · 195 points · 10 months ago
Not to be pedantic but concentration and insulin syringe are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on am I the only one who found regulatory harder than the injections in c/bpc157 · 27 points · 11 months ago
Crossposting this to c/vendorvetting because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on week 36 check-in — 12kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 42 points · 1 year ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on week 11 check-in — 21kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bpc157 · 10 points · 1 year ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in the Netherlands.
comment on reading sequence threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/bpc157 · 0 points · 1 year ago
the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
comment on vendor — my 9-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 1 year ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it