u/camila_sandvik

Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

public logs kept over 2 weeks and beyond

say which nation, England, Scotland, Wales, NI differ

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 14 weeks to accept.

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

TGA watches change monthly, follow the list

Not to be pedantic but PDF metadata and fraud are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

The 503A pharmacy I used lost their shortage list eligibility. Same day, compounding became illegal. Rules are real.

state how long you have been at maintenance, week 15 is not maintenance

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

This is correct. Private and NHS pathways are different.

Boots stock check: called 2 locations in the Netherlands, 39 had 1.7mg in stock. Regional variation is real.

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

update rather than repost, 11 people doing this

the 2.4mg dose is not the target, it is just what the pen goes up to

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

This is correct. Long-term logs matter.

MKM order #12, Canada, no drama, receipts inside

Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?