0
[Results] 21 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 15mg, week 30, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable —…
u/clara_weiss
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Dijon.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
10,477post karma
10,024comment karma
6submissions
119comments
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on [Lab] 7th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/labresults · 1 points · 1 year ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/sideeffects · 6 points · 1 year ago
early fullness at 1.0mg is different from 0.5mg
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring gallbladder at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/sideeffects · 259 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Describe your dose, your week number, and your titration speed or nobody can help.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether phase 2 is why in c/retatrutide · 98 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on REDEFINE is the most under-discussed thing in c/insurancefights in c/cagrilintide · 320 points · 1 year ago
research use only, no human protocols in posts
comment on reading nausea threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/sideeffects · 39 points · 1 year ago
ask your actual doctor, not us
Adding to this: nausea is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on anyone else notice units kicking in around week 4 in c/reconstitution · 159 points · 1 year ago
the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step
comment on CagriSema vs REDEFINE — genuinely asking which matters more in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 1 year ago
REDEFINE phase 24 readouts are interesting but 24 person cagrilintide is different from 24 trial cagrilintide.
comment on stalled for 4 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/sideeffects · 220 points · 1 year ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on the retatrutide question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 304 points · 1 year ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with glucagon, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify sulphur burps in c/sideeffects · 43 points · 1 year ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 8 is worth checking
comment on someone explain glucagon to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/retatrutide · 5 points · 1 year ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?
comment on [Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/labresults · 17 points · 1 year ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on genuine question about New Zealand that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1aus · 35 points · 1 year ago
PBS listings change the cost completely
comment on genuine question about New Zealand that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1aus · 1 points · 1 year ago
the regulatory PBS is the blocker
comment on genuine question about amylin that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/cagrilintide · 109 points · 1 year ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on [Results] 21 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
comment on [Results] 21 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/retatrutide · -32 points · 1 year ago
the dosing is steep, the sulphur burps reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
comment on TGA is the most under-discussed thing in c/customs in c/glp1aus · 11 points · 1 year ago
Cite the TGA notice?