u/cold_chromatogram31
Here for the tables, not the takes.
member · joined 26 Nov 2025
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/progresspics · 158 points · 1 year ago
text removes the body-shaming pile-on
comment on [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/progresspics · 66 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, text-only removes the comparison.
comment on tried A1c for 22 weeks. here is what happened. in c/bloodwork · 426 points · 1 year ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on 24 months in and scam is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 292 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on reading endpoint threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
Disagree.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on why does nobody talk about lipids in c/bloodwork · 13 points · 1 year ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on why does nobody talk about lipids in c/bloodwork · 11 points · 1 year ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is ALT. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on anyone else notice customs kicking in around week 79 in c/customs · 100 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on anyone else notice customs kicking in around week 79 in c/customs · -2 points · 1 year ago
The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on the baseline labs thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for 503A posts in c/compounding · 48 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.
comment on anyone else notice ferritin kicking in around week 34 in c/bloodwork · 7 points · 2 years ago
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
comment on fraud: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 13 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
comment on reading state board threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/compounding · 11 points · 2 years ago
the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again
comment on [Results] 77 weeks, 21kg, and endpoint was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 120 points · 2 years ago
event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone
comment on help me understand 503A, I have read the wiki twice in c/compounding · 262 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. The shortage list does expire and the rules change.
comment on TRIUMPH — 13 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/trialwatch · -12 points · 2 years ago
STEP 1 readout: 99.3% mean weight loss, absolute numbers matter. Spread around that mean is enormous.
comment on week 91 check-in — 32kg down, nausea manageable, one thing confusing me in c/compounding · -18 points · 2 years ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on does eGFR actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/bloodwork · 33 points · 2 years ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is lipids. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on SELECT is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/trialwatch · 41 points · 2 years ago
STEP 1 readout: 99.3% mean weight loss, absolute numbers matter.
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.