fraud: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1
Week 57 update. 28kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 14.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
the WXT situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 14–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Adding to this: fake COA is doing more work than the comment implies.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with exit scam, not with what you concluded.
The Medutest results I got back showed 97.4% but WXT claimed 97.9%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
Small correction: the trial was 11 weeks, not 4. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with fake COA, not with what you concluded.
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
- 1reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations7 comments in this branch · started by u/reflux_report
- 2Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.5 comments in this branch · started by u/whois_wanda