GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
6.3k
c/scamalerts·posted 2 years ago by u/marisol_frisk

fraud — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right

PSA Receipts ×8 Sourced ×3 Long Haul ×3

Been lurking in c/darkspot for about 9 months and finally have something worth posting.

Short version: week 48, 1.7mg, and group buy is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 13 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.

What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 42.

7,335 up / 1,032 down88% upvoted41 commentsid 1qqdem19 Mar 2024

41 comments

23 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/neha_mwangi-7 points·2 years ago

Dated screenshot or is this from memory?

replysharereportpermalink
u/rania_diallo1 point·2 years ago

a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so

replysharereportpermalink
u/long_post_larry1 point·2 years ago

a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_friskOP1 point·2 years ago

PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_batista1 point·2 years ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/osman_brandt1 point·2 years ago·edited

Can you post the VendorInvestigate result that shows the problem?

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient697 points·2 years ago

Did SWB respond or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/britt_zamora940 points·2 years ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_2024193 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik157 points·2 years ago·edited

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_yildiz91 points·2 years ago

Not convinced.

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_notes135 points·2 years ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_teixeira1.1k points·2 years ago

the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_kuipers701 points·2 years ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink
u/mikkel_ogunleye479 points·2 years ago

no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not

replysharereportpermalink
u/divya_bakken266 points·2 years ago

a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_friskOP137 points·2 years ago

The cloned SGN store used our old homepage image from 2023. Reverse image search caught it in 17 seconds.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_friskOP106 points·2 years ago

no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not

replysharereportpermalink
u/halima_boateng45 points·2 years ago

the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting

replysharereportpermalink
u/divya_bakken35 points·2 years ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard202 points·2 years ago

group buy exit scams follow a pattern

replysharereportpermalink
u/foam_head_fred0 points·2 years ago

group buy exit scams follow a pattern

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 2 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.