GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of fraud — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right — 41 comments in the full submission. View in context.
6.3k
c/scamalerts·submitted 2 years ago by u/marisol_frisk

fraud — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right

PSAbranch of 8 comments

Been lurking in c/darkspot for about 9 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 48, 1.7mg, and group buy is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 13 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know is…

Read the full submission and all 41 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 years ago
u/careful_gradient697 points·2 years ago

Did SWB respond or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/britt_zamora940 points·2 years ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_2024193 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik157 points·2 years ago·edited

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_yildiz91 points·2 years ago

Not convinced.

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_notes135 points·2 years ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_teixeira1.1k points·2 years ago

the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_kuipers701 points·2 years ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →