GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
8.1k
c/scamalerts·posted 2 years ago by u/fatima_yildiz

anyone else notice fraud kicking in around week 75

PSA Long Haul ×3 Slow Clap ×1 Cold Box ×2

Quick one. Canada here.

scam works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.

Specifics: the route I used took 18 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.

Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.

8,481 up / 382 down96% upvoted34 commentsid 1sodrz1 Nov 2023

34 comments

30 in this archive, depth 6

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/muscle_cramp_mo1.2k points·2 years ago

The Medutest results I got back showed 96.8% but GL Biochem claimed 98.0%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reflux_report595 points·2 years ago

Dated screenshot or is this from memory?

replysharereportpermalink
u/signe_boateng294 points·2 years ago

a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]208 points·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/archived_thread_a305 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyMOD236 points·2 years ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/freya_onwuka182 points·2 years ago

Removed a chain here.

Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_aalto75 points·2 years ago·edited

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_yilmaz188 points·2 years ago·edited

no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not

replysharereportpermalink
u/rulebook_rachaelmod · c/meta53 points·2 years ago

no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/muscle_cramp_mo259 points·2 years ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/chidi_vermeulen-35 points·2 years ago

evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test

replysharereportpermalink
u/lukas_delgado511 points·2 years ago·edited

cloned storefronts use old images, search for those

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_chukwu311 points·2 years ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/protein_first_pnutrition359 points·2 years ago

the WWB situation resolved, logged it here as resolved

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_teixeira106 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 99.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_cardoso66 points·2 years ago

a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_yildiz206 points·2 years ago

You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/RetaAndRegret2168 points·2 years ago

You have restated the marketing copy.

Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren104 points·2 years ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nordic_pricing25 points·2 years ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_pires18 points·2 years ago

no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_teixeira144 points·2 years ago

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

replysharereportpermalink
u/lucia_bruun92 points·2 years ago

evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts39 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/osman_brandt242 points·2 years ago

Did JEEP respond or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_yildizOP88 points·2 years ago

PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_yildizOP40 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ravi_bergstrom174 points·2 years ago

The GL Biochem exit scam collected 18 orders and disappeared. Order ids 27 through 18 all silent.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren144 points·2 years ago·edited

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.