GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of anyone else notice fraud kicking in around week 75 — 34 comments in the full submission. View in context.
8.1k
c/scamalerts·submitted 2 years ago by u/fatima_yildiz

anyone else notice fraud kicking in around week 75

PSAbranch of 11 comments

Quick one. Canada here. scam works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US. Specifics: the route I used took 18 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost.…

Read the full submission and all 34 comments →

This branch

11 comments, started 2 years ago
u/reflux_report595 points·2 years ago

Dated screenshot or is this from memory?

replysharereportpermalink
u/signe_boateng294 points·2 years ago

a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]208 points·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/archived_thread_a305 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyMOD236 points·2 years ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/freya_onwuka182 points·2 years ago

Removed a chain here.

Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_aalto75 points·2 years ago·edited

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_yilmaz188 points·2 years ago·edited

no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not

replysharereportpermalink
u/rulebook_rachaelmod · c/meta53 points·2 years ago

no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/muscle_cramp_mo259 points·2 years ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/chidi_vermeulen-35 points·2 years ago

evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.