73
[Discussion] the incretin advice in here is 14 years out of date
I have had 8 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied…
u/ferran_batista
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Medellín.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
3,009post karma
4,175comment karma
3submissions
62comments
comment on [Denied] employer carve-out was in the plan document, not the summary in c/insurancefights · 4 points · 5 days ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [CGM] my dawn phenomenon barely changed and that surprised me in c/t2dglp1 · 13 points · 8 days ago
A1c, CGM, stacking with metformin
comment on four accounts, same typo, same hour, all recommending the same shop in c/scamalerts · 39 points · 14 days ago
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
comment on [Question] Poland — has anyone got a straight answer on jurisdiction in c/customs · 15 points · 24 days ago
Came off after 15 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on [Meta] the hypoglycaemia rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/t2dglp1 · 47 points · 1 months ago
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
comment on [Confirmed] site copied our own wiki text word for word to look legitimate in c/scamalerts · 14 points · 1 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is scam. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on [Pattern] brand-new domain + aged social proof = generated reviews in c/scamalerts · 2 points · 1 months ago
Which order and did you have any communication from GGPeps?
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 94 in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 1 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with cloned site, not with what you concluded.
comment on reading formulary threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/insurancefights · 4 points · 1 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Discussion] the incretin advice in here is 14 years out of date in c/glp1science · 4 points · 3 months ago
Stomach physiology changed when I moved up to 10mg. Gastric emptying lag is the whole story.
comment on [Discussion] the incretin advice in here is 14 years out of date in c/glp1science · 7 points · 3 months ago
Stomach physiology changed when I moved up to 2.4mg. Gastric emptying lag is the whole story.
comment on [Discussion] the incretin advice in here is 14 years out of date in c/glp1science · 7 points · 3 months ago
receptor distribution matters, GLP-1 is not everywhere
comment on glycaemic control: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/t2dglp1 · 0 points · 3 months ago
n=1 but same
comment on [Results] 91 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/scamalerts · 18 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for gastric emptying posts in c/glp1science · 1 points · 3 months ago
amylin is not GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
comment on reading exit scam threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 4 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on receptor: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1science · 90 points · 4 months ago
The mechanism literature is interesting but rodent models do not scale linearly to human dosing.
comment on receptor: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1science · 0 points · 4 months ago
gastric emptying is real and explains most early nausea
comment on receptor: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1science · 143 points · 4 months ago
The appetite literature is interesting but rodent models do not scale linearly to human dosing.