[Discussion] the incretin advice in here is 14 years out of date
I have had 8 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 18 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 96.8% against a claimed 99.1%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 10–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
rodent pharmacology tells you what to investigate, not what to expect in humans
incretin physiology is appetite, the mechanism layer
source?
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
receptor distribution matters, GLP-1 is not everywhere
Stomach physiology changed when I moved up to 2.4mg. Gastric emptying lag is the whole story.
Stomach physiology changed when I moved up to 10mg. Gastric emptying lag is the whole story.
- 1source?8 comments in this branch · started by u/kian_balogun