GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
121
c/scamalerts·posted 1 months ago by u/rulebook_rachael

[Pattern] brand-new domain + aged social proof = generated reviews

Pattern

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.

The claim: cloned site matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 21 months without either producing anything.

What would actually settle it is 17 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.

If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.

124 up / 3 down98% upvoted12 commentsid ncumts16 Jun 2026

12 comments

12 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/laila_yilmaz19 points·1 months ago

Which order and did you have any communication from SWB?

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_notes14 points·1 months ago

The cloned WWB store used our old homepage image from 2023. Reverse image search caught it in 2 seconds.

replysharereportpermalink
u/RetaAndRegret28 points·1 months ago

sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions

replysharereportpermalink
u/nordic_pricing7 points·1 months ago

cloned storefronts use old images, search for those

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/rasmus_kuipers8 points·1 months ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rulebook_rachaelOPmod · c/meta4 points·1 months ago

This is evidence.

Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rulebook_rachaelOPmod · c/meta-31 points·1 months ago

The VendorInvestigate results I got back showed 97.9% but SWB claimed 98.0%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sock_puppet_spotter1 point·1 months ago

group buy exit scams follow a pattern

replysharereportpermalink
u/sock_puppet_spotter6 points·1 months ago

Dated screenshot or is this from memory?

replysharereportpermalink
u/nils_ferreira3 points·1 months ago

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_batista2 points·1 months ago

Which order and did you have any communication from GGPeps?

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →