68
[Discussion] we should require batch numbers in every vendor post title
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: vendor matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have…
u/rohan_krastev
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Setúbal.
member · joined 14 May 2025
1,696post karma
3,073comment karma
5submissions
36comments
comment on [Discussion] we should require batch numbers in every vendor post title in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 15 days ago
Reship experience: GGPeps asked for photos, processed it in 20 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
comment on [Discussion] we should require batch numbers in every vendor post title in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 15 days ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Vendor] JEEP six orders in, zero problems, and i am suspicious of my own luck in c/vendorvetting · 34 points · 18 days ago
MKM order #2, Poland, no drama, receipts inside
comment on [Resolved] the QST batch dispute — vendor retested, numbers matched, my error in c/vendorvetting · 25 points · 1 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on Medutest: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 1 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on vendor vs testing — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 13 points · 2 months ago
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Results] 91 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/scamalerts · 10 points · 3 months ago
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
comment on unpopular opinion: exit scam is massively overrated in c/scamalerts · 79 points · 4 months ago
The MKM exit scam collected 13 orders and disappeared. Order ids 30 through 13 all silent.
1k
unpopular opinion: exit scam is massively overrated
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: scam matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have…
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 11 points · 5 months ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
comment on am I the only one who found testing harder than the injections in c/vendorvetting · 325 points · 6 months ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on reading Janoshik threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/vendorvetting · 71 points · 7 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on is it normal to get sulphur burps at week 69 in c/scamalerts · 40 points · 7 months ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on testing — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/vendorvetting · 139 points · 8 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on does PeptideMeter actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/vendorvetting · 7 points · 8 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on someone explain stopped to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/darkspot · 9 points · 9 months ago
the 9 order that disappeared from SSA
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · 31 points · 9 months ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on [Question] Poland — has anyone got a straight answer on what went wrong in c/darkspot · 16 points · 10 months ago
money lost to group buys
236
cloned site — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right
Quick one. Canada here. cloned site works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given…